I will say in response that really the majority leader's amendment adds nothing to what is already in the bill except it says including E. coli. Health including E. coli. A health threat already included E. coli. It already includes cryptosporidium. It also includes the Ebola virus. It already includes everything that is encompassed in the world health. So it is totally unnecessary. But if it reassures somebody that now we are taking care of E. coli, so much the better.
David Cay Johnston: “I will say in response that really the majority leader's amendment adds nothing to what is already in the bill except it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the necessity of an amendment related to health threats in a bill.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
I am sending to the desk a sense-of-the- Senate resolution on behalf of the distinguished Senator from West Virginia, Mr. Rockefeller, and others regarding the United States-Japan semiconductor trade agreement which is set to expire on…
Thus, we hold that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act creates an obligation in DOE to start disposing of the spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. Is there any disagreement with what I read in the decision?
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.





