But you said you would have a separate review, even under what counsel for EPA says, that would come only at the final review and solely for the purpose of determining whether or not the final agency action was arbitrary and capricious; is that not correct? It is clear.
Questioning the review process for EPA actions during a discussion.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…
Other voices in this conversation
