If you ever got a cost-benefit analysis done under Glenn-Chafee, all that is consensual. If you want to do it, if you feel like it, if it feels good, do it. Otherwise, do not do it because you do not have to. It is business as usual. Am I not right that it is all consensual on the lookback process under Glenn-Chafee; is that correct?
Discussing the consensual nature of cost-benefit analysis under the Glenn-Chafee legislation.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Let us take this one at a time. You agree with me the Government has no right to take away vested rights, and would be liable for the violation?
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.
nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…
I want to briefly reply to a statement that was made a little earlier by the Senator from Nevada, quoting me a few years back saying that nuclear powerplants were running out of space. The fact of the matter is, that statement was true…
Other voices in this conversation
