Look, we have a whole big section there that speaks for itself, of course, that means the risk analysis and cost-benefit, and it means peer review. And, as I said earlier, there will be times when procedural defects, if someone calls them that, might throw the whole rule out. Suppose it is a regulation on second-hand smoke. If all the scientists were from the tobacco industry, it would be fundamentally unfair and the scientific judgment would be important. And if I were the judge I would throw it out, even though that is a failure to comply because it would render the whole thing as an abusive discretion and arbitrary and capricious.
David Cay Johnston: “Look, we have a whole big section there that speaks for itself, of course, that means the risk analysis and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of scientific integrity in regulatory processes.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?





