On the recordJuly 17, 1995
No. I say the answer is no for the third time. And the reason is that it is not narrowing. It is expanding, and it is ambiguous.
Source
govinfo.govDavid Cay Johnston: “No. I say the answer is no for the third time. And the reason is that it is not narrowing. It is expanding, and it is…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about a proposed measure during a debate.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 25, 1996
The Senator is aware that Vietnam is anxious to have aid from the American Bar Association in helping them develop the rule of law. We have not had that kind of request from Libya and Cuba and others. They are anxious to develop the rule…
Jul 31, 1996
No, the Senator is wrong. First of all, damages would not be paid from the nuclear waste fund. Damages would have to be paid from the judgment fund, provided elsewhere.
Jul 30, 1996
the answer is, yes, these projects for biomass electric will be eligible, and the Department should give full consideration to these projects along with those mentioned in the committee report. These appear to be promising technologies…
Other voices in this conversation
