No; the question of whether this is a rule which has a substantial, significant effect on a substantial number of small businesses, which is the trigger for the reg-flex, it is the intent here--and this language has not been drawn--it is the intent here that that test be only once.
David Cay Johnston: “No; the question of whether this is a rule which has a substantial, significant effect on a substantial number of small…”
On the recordJuly 10, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of regulatory flexibility on small businesses.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 25, 1996
Is my friend saying he will not give aid to help them change the legal system until the legal system is already changed?
Jul 30, 1996
There are many reasons to be against the McCain amendment, but the clearest, most indelible, most compelling reason is that to cut these funds now would subject the U.S. Government to greater penalties for termination costs than it would…
Aug 2, 1996
today I am introducing the DOE Reports Elimination and Streamlining Act of 1996, to implement a number of recommendations that have been received from the administration for the repeal of requirements for unnecessary or obsolete reports to…





