At the end of the 5-year period, it would sunset. Keep in mind that it did not get on the schedule and that the person at the agency was in charge of the schedule, and so he or she could advance the rule as quickly as he could. Would the Senator say that 5 years is not a sufficient time?
David Cay Johnston: “At the end of the 5-year period, it would sunset. Keep in mind that it did not get on the schedule and that the person…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the timeline and scheduling of a regulatory rule.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The point is this, though: They have tested it with weapons 30 times bigger than antitank weapons with direct hits. That caused a breach. Only a third of an ounce comes out. There are many, many much more lucrative targets, by orders of…





