But now if the Senator will look over on the previous page, subsection (3), An interested party may petition the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to extend the period for review of a rule on the schedule for up to 2 years, and to grant such equitable relief as is appropriate. To be sure, if nobody cares, if the agency head wants the rule to terminate and the whole world wants it to terminate and nobody cares, nobody files a petition--yes. But that is a whole lot different from saying that this thing automatically sunsets.
David Cay Johnston: “But now if the Senator will look over on the previous page, subsection (3), An interested party may petition the U.S.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing provisions related to the review of regulatory rules.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?
Well, as of this moment, Donald Trump is out of business in New York because all of his business certificates, business licenses in effect have been cancelled.
I send a letter to the desk addressed to me dated today and signed by Terry R. Lash, Director of the Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology, which details the principal arguments against terminating the advanced light water…
This is sort of a version 2 of the Wellstone amendment, in that it seeks to take the rights of utilities and, secondarily, the rights of ratepayers of utilities, and abolish those by legislative fiat--which simply cannot be done. The…





