First of all, when we are talking about free speech, the underlying issue here really is associated with free speech in USIA funding, the ability of groups in the Middle East to market their views and opinions. The gentleman's amendment would cut that off. We can argue about the content of that speech, but I think the gentleman's amendment cuts it off regardless of the content.
Discussing the implications of an amendment on free speech related to USIA funding.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
this amendment, as we understand it, is merely a restatement of current law, which already prohibits the employment of unauthorized aliens. We don't read into it that it imposes any new burden on those who are using funds appropriated…
They do have the right take, and she obviously has picked a substantive issue to be concerned about and defend, and the gentleman is to be commended for picking it up and fighting for her and sea turtles.
A day that I am going to do my best to remind everybody of every chance I get is June 1st, because that is the day that the United States starts living on credit and charging everything that we do to our kids, sending them the bill.
If we could think of things like research initiation grants where we are giving money directly to HBCUs to fund their faculty research, to give them the time, those are where the bodies are, the roles models.
Other voices in this conversation
