If there is money in this bill, it is funny money, it is more worthless than monopoly money. We cannot put money in an appropriations bill. The purpose is to appropriate money; it is an action activity; and make it contingent upon finding the money. We either have it in the appropriations bill or we do not. This appropriations bill does not fund peacekeeping, it does not fund the Advanced Technology Program, and it does not fund the COPS Program. That kills the COPS Program, and that is terribly regrettable and, I think, will guarantee its veto, as the majority knows, by the President of the United States.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about funding in an appropriations bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
the gentleman seeks to increase by a factor of two the hurricane intensity forecast capability. There is a lot of concern with regard to this. We certainly are extremely sympathetic to the purpose of the amendment. We do not like the…
No. It's terminal. It's a bad offset. It degrades the Census Bureau's ability to collect economic statistics, which is terrible. But please.
If we could think of things like research initiation grants where we are giving money directly to HBCUs to fund their faculty research, to give them the time, those are where the bodies are, the roles models.
I think this amendment is one more expression of a number one concern about the attention that education is getting in our various science accounts. We have attempted very diligently, pointedly, to address that by increasing funding in…





