I would like to speak to that issue, because I respectfully disagree that there is anything unclear about the issue or about the agreement associated with the issue that was achieved in the context of the 1999 VA-HUD conference. In that conference it was made clear, to put it in simple turns, that the EPA or the United States Government could not, would not, under the terms of that conference report, and they acknowledged that they would not if there was nothing in the conference report, try to implement the Kyoto Protocol prior to its being ratified by the United States Senate, meaning that they would not engage in a rule-making proceeding to establish standards for American industry out of any requirement, any agreement, flowing out of the Kyoto Protocol.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I would like to speak to that issue, because I respectfully disagree that there is anything unclear about the issue or…”
On the recordJune 21, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the clarity of agreements related to the Kyoto Protocol during a debate on the VA-HUD appropriation bill.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
Feb 2, 2010
A day that I am going to do my best to remind everybody of every chance I get is June 1st, because that is the day that the United States starts living on credit and charging everything that we do to our kids, sending them the bill.
Feb 2, 2010
My point is that we hope that the Commerce Department will focus just as aggressively on unfair imports as we are in trying to break the barriers, unfair barriers that exist to our exports.
Feb 2, 2010
If I leave you with one message, it is science agencies must play a leadership role in the improvement of science education.





