That would have straight-out eliminated the station program. I understand why the gentleman did that. It has been defeated on this floor a number of times and the body has spoken pretty overwhelmingly with regard to that issue. I frankly do not quite understand this amendment, and that is why I want to engage the gentleman in a discussion of it at the front of this overall debate. I have the amendment here before me and it says, ``None of the funds made available in this act may be used by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration to obligate amounts for International Space Station in contravention of cost limitations established in section 202 of the 2000 authorization for NASA.'' Correct?
Alan B. Mollohan: “That would have straight-out eliminated the station program. I understand why the gentleman did that. It has been…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to funding for the International Space Station during a debate.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
They do have the right take, and she obviously has picked a substantive issue to be concerned about and defend, and the gentleman is to be commended for picking it up and fighting for her and sea turtles.
If I have any time left, Mr. Chairman, I would just point out that about 90 percent of the account where the gentleman is seeking an offset, the general administrative account, goes towards operational support for the Department of Justice…
I just want to expand on the excellent debate and the points that have been made in opposition to this amendment. The fact is we are in a period of rising crime. In the last 2 years we have experienced a rise in crime. We are looking at an…
in this body, anyone has a right and an opportunity, as the gentleman has taken advantage of, to raise whatever issue one wants. The gentleman raises an issue in the context of virtuousness and virtuosity. He raises a virtue issue here; he…





