Political Quotes

Thomas M. Barrett: I think I have a better understanding now why the Republicans did not want to have the line-item veto apply this year.…

On the recordApril 25, 1996
I think I have a better understanding now why the Republicans did not want to have the line-item veto apply this year. It was this type of provision, this type of provision that allows the State of Louisiana and the State of New Hampshire to benefit at the expenses of taxpayers throughout this country. It should not be in this bill, it should never have been put in this bill, and it is a disgrace that we have this in a bill at a time when we are trying to work together to bridge the gap between the two sides of this House. I am ashamed that we have this in this bill, and I am sorry it is here. This was a good faith attempt by Members on our side of the aisle to reach a compromise.
Said by
Thomas M. Barrett
Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Addressing concerns about a provision in a bill that benefits certain states at the expense of taxpayers.

Share

More from Thomas M. Barrett

Jun 22, 1999

Mr. Juan Carlos Ruiz is a fine member of my home community of Milwaukee, Wisconsin and I am proud to announce that he has been recognized for his good work with the nation's most distinguished citation for community health leadership: the…

congress.gov
Jul 23, 1998

I would like to briefly pay tribute to one of my heroes, too. Mr. Stokes is just a tremendous, tremendous person. Earlier this year I spoke, following Maxine Waters and Congressman Stokes, to a group here in the Capitol, and as I explained…

govinfo.gov
Dec 18, 1998

several of the previous speakers have said that no man is above the law. I passionately and fervently agree, as do the Members on this side, and that is why our censure resolution specifically states that the President remain subject to…

govinfo.gov
Jun 22, 1999

For the past several years, Juan Carlos Ruiz has led the fight against childhood lead poisoning in inner-city Milwaukee.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation