I understand it is an authorization, but we had the senior member of the committee from my State and others in the authorization committee, appropriation committee, which would have to actually appropriate money, saying that this was taking away from priorities that they felt were important. Now we are adding to their burden, I think. But I would be interested to see how they vote on this amendment because if they really are concerned and consistent, this would receive a ``no'' vote, not a ``yes'' vote from those gentlemen.
Thomas E. Petri: “I understand it is an authorization, but we had the senior member of the committee from my State and others in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about budget priorities during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Thomas E. Petri
We have all these options for drilling on Federal property, ways that we can use our domestic resources to keep from sending money overseas and bring our fuel costs down.
Just to make sure the record is clear, I'm informed by staff that the bill was noticed in regular order, and no rules were waived concerning its regular consideration by the committee or, in fact, by the House. Mr. Speaker, I yield 30…
I encourage all Members to support this bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
While most normal businesses would raise their prices in the face of rising costs, unfortunately these providers are in the unique position of only having one customer--the Medicaid program.





