I understand it is an authorization, but we had the senior member of the committee from my State and others in the authorization committee, appropriation committee, which would have to actually appropriate money, saying that this was taking away from priorities that they felt were important. Now we are adding to their burden, I think. But I would be interested to see how they vote on this amendment because if they really are concerned and consistent, this would receive a ``no'' vote, not a ``yes'' vote from those gentlemen.
Thomas E. Petri: “I understand it is an authorization, but we had the senior member of the committee from my State and others in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about budget priorities during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Thomas E. Petri
While my Republican colleagues and I continue to support the basic principles of competition and transparency to help encourage lower costs in higher education, we remain concerned that such policies could lead to federal price controls…
The debate we are having today is not really about the future of the highway trust fund. Unfortunately, today is about doing what Congress does too often--kicking the can down the road, avoiding one crisis while setting up another. I…
I urge all Members to support the bill before us, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Petri) that the House suspend the rules and pass…
Our infrastructure, our transportation system has been the foundation of our economic greatness in this country, and we need to step up and demand that we find a way to continue to finance it.





