it is a shame and a scandal that many anti-poverty programs actually keep people poor by making it too expensive for them to work their way out of poverty. Our many anti-poverty programs were individually designed without regard for each other and without regard for the fact that if several benefits phase out simultaneously a poor person who works hard may find himself or herself worse off than if he or she stayed home or had done the minimum necessary to maintain the maximum level of benefits. I call this the poverty trap. Able-bodied people will work their way out of poverty if they can clearly see the benefit. Accordingly, today I am introducing the Poverty Trap Study Act, to create a commission to examine the way benefit phase-outs and tax increases can sap the incentive of poor beneficiaries. It is a hard problem to tackle, but we must get started. This is an issue that liberals, conservatives, and moderates should all find of compelling importance, and I solicit my colleagues' support.
Thomas E. Petri: “it is a shame and a scandal that many anti-poverty programs actually keep people poor by making it too expensive for…”
Editor's note · Context
Introducing the Poverty Trap Study Act to address issues in anti-poverty programs.
Share
More from Thomas E. Petri
Polls show time and again that the public supports continued funding of higher education and we're grateful for bipartisan support for programs like the Pell Grant.
I hope that it will be the basis for setting a global standard which others could benefit from.
While my Republican colleagues and I continue to support the basic principles of competition and transparency to help encourage lower costs in higher education, we remain concerned that such policies could lead to federal price controls…
While most normal businesses would raise their prices in the face of rising costs, unfortunately these providers are in the unique position of only having one customer--the Medicaid program.





