If we think this through rationally, essentially what will happen is, if we end up with this crazy local, State, national patchwork of requirements for labeling standards, eventually companies will say well, we will do that for California, because California has got so many people in it, it is worth the investment. But it might not be in North Dakota, or it might not be in Delaware. So essentially you will see a situation where companies and consumers will be deprived of the opportunity to buy things off the shelves simply because of labeling standards that add very little value to the amount of information that a consumer already has in front of him or in front of her. Again, we all agree on the committee that you want nutritional labeling standards in place, but one set of labels nationally. And if you are unhappy with an individual provision, get it changed once for California and Delaware and Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and not for every single community.
Scott Klug: “If we think this through rationally, essentially what will happen is, if we end up with this crazy local, State…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for uniform national labeling standards during a debate.
Share
More from Scott Klug
on May 18, President Clinton went on national radio and called Wisconsin Works a solid, bold welfare reform proposal. Several days later he repeated the same line in the State of Wisconsin. When Governor Thompson submitted Wisconsin's bold…
I do not think the Galvin Commission said whether it was a 15-percent or 30-percent cut. They recommended redefining the mission of the laboratories and appropriately downsizing. I agree with my colleague, the gentleman from Indiana [Mr…
I would encourage the gentlewoman as a member of the President's party to issue waivers more quickly. However, let me say fundamentally that waivers are not welfare reform, waivers are a lifeline for bureaucracies to rewrite and to change…
I think anything but the contrary. The public, which should be involved in this decision, has already been involved in the decision. It is the residents of the State of Wisconsin who had 30 hearings and town meetings, 120 hours of debate…





