As I stated during a Commerce Committee hearing on September 2, 2003 regarding this issue, the original lease transaction is nothing more than a complex, byzantine transaction that obscured the true cost of the tankers, reduced the transparency of the arrangement, and would unnecessarily cost American taxpayers billions of dollars. I commend the Senator from Arizona for his watchful eye over the negotiation and execution of this tanker deal. I also commend Senators Warner and Levin for brokering the compromise agreement and putting the public interest ahead of a powerful special interest.
Scott Fitzgerald: “As I stated during a Commerce Committee hearing on September 2, 2003 regarding this issue, the original lease…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns over a tanker lease transaction and its impact on taxpayers.
Share
More from Scott Fitzgerald
Due to unforeseen travel delays, I was unable to cast a vote on H.R. 517, Roll Call No. 84, and H.R. 997, Roll Call No. 85. Had I been present, I would have voted YEA on both roll call no. 84 and roll call no. 85. personal explanation
To close. Mr. Speaker, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle mentioned that many of these bail funds operate locally and, therefore, do not affect interstate commerce. I think it is important to describe the current landscape of the…
I thank Chairman Guthrie and Congressman Griffith for their leadership on this issue. This is a historic moment, Mr. Speaker. House Republicans are delivering on a promise to stop the flow of deadly fentanyl that, for years, has been…
The debate today is really focused on whether or not the FBI should be required to obtain a warrant to access U.S. person data. As the quote we are all familiar with says, insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting…





