That was probably a huge percentage of their revenues--all fictitious--from doing wash trades on an online exchange with no economic purpose. But that fictitious revenue was fooling the investing public, making people think that company had more revenue than it actually did. They were all just ``wash'' trades.
Scott Fitzgerald: “That was probably a huge percentage of their revenues--all fictitious--from doing wash trades on an online exchange with…”
On the recordJune 10, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of fictitious revenue from wash trades on the investing public.
Share
More from Scott Fitzgerald
Nov 8, 2023
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: At the end of the bill (before the short title) insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds made…
Mar 20, 2024
I have been particularly concerned with the proposals disincentivizing banks from offering conventional loans to first-time homebuyers and low- to moderate-income borrowers.
Mar 22, 2023
The first bill I introduced as a Member of Congress was to permanently designate fentanyl analogues as a Schedule I drug.





