Because they were simply trading back and forth amongst themselves at a price that really was not determined on an arms' length basis. They were just engaging in bogus trades back and forth to artificially set a price or to artificially increase revenues for the companies on both sides of the trade. Some of these transactions were done on the InterContinental Exchange. As I recall, when we had the hearing before the Senate Agriculture Committee, either early this winter or maybe even last fall, some shareholder on the InterContinental Exchange came before the committee and testified that notwithstanding the official position of the exchange they, as an owner of the exchange, disagreed with the policy of the InterContinental Exchange on this, and they favored our elimination of this Enron online loophole in the commodities laws; they thought that the company in which they were a shareholder would be better off if there were some regulation of their business.
Scott Fitzgerald: “Because they were simply trading back and forth amongst themselves at a price that really was not determined on an arms'…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing issues related to trading practices and regulation in commodities markets.
Share
More from Scott Fitzgerald
I will spend the time I have remaining responding to a few points made by my colleagues. First of all, the U.S. States and territories already criminalize the misuse of less-lethal devices through existing assault and battery laws, and 34…
I include in the Record a cost estimate for H.R. 288, prepared by the Congressional Budget Office. H.R. 288, SEPARATION OF POWERS RESTORATION ACT OF 2023, AS ORDERED REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ON MAY 10, 2023…
Sustainable homeownership is obviously a mechanism for young adults to try and get into the market and build wealth.
I inform the Speaker that I have no further speakers, and I reserve the balance of my time.





