If someone is in the business of making medical decisions that affect the health, welfare and lives of patients, that individual should be held to the same standard of responsibility as anyone else involved in that process, period. No exceptions. No carve-outs. No special treatments based on political contributions made in this place. That is what is at stake at the end of today's debate. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to reject the Norwood special treatment amendment and instead pass a fair Patients' Bill of Rights.
Ron Kind: “If someone is in the business of making medical decisions that affect the health, welfare and lives of patients, that…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the importance of accountability in medical decision-making during a debate on the Patients' Bill of Rights.
Share
More from Ron Kind
It doesn't make sense. Without Medicare coverage for needed immunosuppressive drugs, transplant patients risk losing their new kidney.
This bipartisan legislation, endorsed by the National Association of Community Health Centers, would expand patient access to essential physical therapist services.
The tax benefit conferred on taxpayers who invest in qualified opportunity funds are tax benefits for the rich.
Many of us had a problem, not only the lack of incentives for the economic growth that we need as part of this tax cut but the fact that it wasn't paid for, which with interest payments now will explode our debt by $2.3 trillion over the…





