This is based on a 2-year rolling average of commodity prices rather than 5 years that the administration was proposing. But even 2 years ago, commodity prices were at or near record lows. What this means is that it will take very little for the prices to drop today for this program to get triggered and for tens of billions of dollars to be flowing out in further subsidy programs because of the way this is structured, and that is wrong. And we should be more honest, not only with the Members of this Congress of how it's going to work, but with the American taxpayer. One farm economist called this new ACRE program, and I quote, ``lucrative beyond expectations.'' That is what has been created. So instead of reform, we are heading in the opposite direction.
Ron Kind: “This is based on a 2-year rolling average of commodity prices rather than 5 years that the administration was proposing.…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the ACRE program and its impact on commodity prices and subsidies.
Share
More from Ron Kind
This has been a great bipartisan effort in committee. Again, I thank the chairman and the ranking member for creating the environment not just with today's legislation, but the previous SECURE Act that we passed roughly 2 years ago, and…
Many of us had a problem, not only the lack of incentives for the economic growth that we need as part of this tax cut but the fact that it wasn't paid for, which with interest payments now will explode our debt by $2.3 trillion over the…
It doesn't make sense. Without Medicare coverage for needed immunosuppressive drugs, transplant patients risk losing their new kidney.
The tax benefit conferred on taxpayers who invest in qualified opportunity funds are tax benefits for the rich.





