we are now in day 83, 83 days after July 4, the day that the President asked this body to enact campaign finance reform. I do not know what we are so concerned about, what we are so afraid of on this side of the congressional House. The Senate is starting to make some movement; I think it is time for us in the House of Representatives to do the same. But I do not want to have a false debate or a false bill come before this floor. I do not want a bill that we are going to sit here and look at that contains a poison pill. A poison pill is something that is going to place one party at a distinct disadvantage of another party. That is why I am proud of the product that I and other Members of the freshman bipartisan task force on finance reform have produced and have introduced. It is a commonsense approach that gets rid of the biggest of the big money, a soft money ban, requires greater identification of groups trying to influence the outcome of elections, requiring greater disclosure of candidates and where the money sources are coming from, but we need to schedule this now: An honest debate, a bill that is receiving bipartisan support, something that us freshmen have produced together, working in a way that can receive support on both sides of the aisle. The time to get to work is now.
Ron Kind: “we are now in day 83, 83 days after July 4, the day that the President asked this body to enact campaign finance reform.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for campaign finance reform in the House of Representatives.
Share
More from Ron Kind
I thank my friend from Massachusetts for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, I rise, first, in opposition to the rule. I think the gentleman from Massachusetts is correct. Here we are in the waning days of this session of Congress, and we…
I thank the gentleman for yielding. I rise in strong support of the SECURE Act. This legislation is meant to address one of the great gaps we have in retirement savings: employees in small businesses, primarily affecting women, minorities…
I am not convinced that China, when they are mis-practicing trade and not abiding by the rules, is only doing that to discriminate against U.S. interests or U.S. companies.
I come to a very fearful conclusion that the President of Russia owns the President of the United States.





