today we have a chance to fundamentally reform agriculture policy so all farmers in all regions of the country will benefit under the next farm bill. I, along with the gentleman from New York (Mr. Boehlert), the gentleman from Maryland (Mr. Gilchrest) and the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Dingell) will offer an amendment that takes a little bit of the increase of the subsidy payments that the largest commodity producers will receive, and instead move those resources into voluntary and incentive-based land and water conservation programs that our farmers want and are calling for. As the Bush administration made clear in their statement on the farm bill released yesterday, even they cannot support the committee bill because, and I quote, ``It misses the opportunity to modernize the Nation's farm programs through market oriented tools, innovative environmental programs, including extending benefits to working lands and aid programs that are consistent with our trade agenda.'' Our amendment, Madam Speaker, accomplishes these objectives, and I urge my colleagues to support the Boehlert-Kind-Gilchrest-Dingell amendment.
Ron Kind: “today we have a chance to fundamentally reform agriculture policy so all farmers in all regions of the country will…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing agriculture policy reform and an amendment to the farm bill.
Share
More from Ron Kind
We are in an era now of huge budget deficits, yet we are finding an additional $1 billion under the title 1 subsidy programs, primarily by taking it out of the conservation fund by reducing funding under the Conservation Stewardship…
This has been a great bipartisan effort in committee. Again, I thank the chairman and the ranking member for creating the environment not just with today's legislation, but the previous SECURE Act that we passed roughly 2 years ago, and…
I was unable to have my votes recorded on the House floor on Thursday, September 26 and Friday, September 27, 2019 due to a family matter. Had I been present, I would have voted in favor of H.R. 3525, H.R. 3722, and S.J. Res. 54…
Our trade agenda is seriously off the rails, and it needs to get back on track quickly, or we are going to be suffering economically as a consequence.





