During debate tonight on the Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment to the farm bill I offered with my colleagues Mr. Flake, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Ryan, and others, a false claim was made regarding the budgetary impact of the amendment, and I would like to correct the record to reflect the truth. While the error, to the best of my knowledge, was not intentional and the false statement was not made knowingly, I believe it is important that I make the accurate information known. Tonight, Chairman Peterson stated that the savings claimed by the reforms made by the amendment were not realized, and he questioned, therefore, the validity of these reforms. Unfortunately, the statement was based on inaccurate information. After consulting with the Congressional Budget Office, it appears the Chairman was basing his comments on a comparison with current law rather than a comparison to H.R. 2419, which was how our amendment was drafted. The official CBO score shows that our amendment would have, in fact, saved the government billions of dollars during both the five- and 10-year windows in relation to the bill as reported by the Agriculture Committee. It is unfortunate this mistake was made on the House floor tonight and was not corrected at the time. When writing policy that affects every single American, it is important that we base our decisions on timely and accurate information. I appreciate this opportunity to provide the real facts on our amendment.
Ron Kind: “During debate tonight on the Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment to the farm bill I offered with my colleagues…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing a false claim about the budgetary impact of the Fairness in Farm and Food Policy Amendment.
Share
More from Ron Kind
I think we are all in agreement that they are stealing our intellectual property, they are requiring technology transfers, they are requiring joint ventures that place our companies in a minority position, they are dumping steel below…
I am so happy to hear such wide, bipartisan support for the need to protect individuals with preexisting conditions.
the tax benefit conferred on taxpayers who invest in qualified opportunity funds are tax benefits for the rich.
I thank my friend from Massachusetts for yielding me this time. Mr. Speaker, I am a member of that committee of jurisdiction. I also remember growing up as a kid in Wisconsin, and many of us looked forward to this radio program that Paul…





