I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, once again, the Congress has offered Members the classic Sophie's choice. Either vote ``no'' on the transportation bill and guarantee no reforms to road and bridge building happen, or vote ``yes'' and get reforms necessary to save money and streamline construction, but do it without actually paying for it and keep racking up the national debt. While many of my colleagues are sure to rush to the floor in the next few hours to pat themselves on the back for accomplishing this marvelous, transformational highway bill, we should not be popping champagne. There is no backslapping deserved. While I am encouraged by the fact that in many ways the policy related to surface transportation takes a significant step forward, I am deeply discouraged by the phony pay-fors. Mr. Speaker, during the upcoming debate on this legislation, you and the American people are going to hear repeatedly that this bill is fully offset and fully paid for, essentially that new revenue and savings will keep the cost of this bill from adding to our national debt. This is, plain and simple, not the case. Most of the offsets are from general fund transfers. Now, it would take a magician of miraculous skill to transfer money out of a fund that has a negative balance of $400 billion.…
Reid Ribble: “I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Speaker, once again, the Congress has offered Members the classic Sophie's…”
Share
More from Reid Ribble
I thank the chairman for yielding. Article I, section 1 of the United States Constitution says: ``The Congress shall have the power''--I want to repeat--``the Congress shall have the power to make rules concerning the capture on land and…
I feel that if we are going to continue to incent American shipbuilding, which the Navy needs, and we are going to be fair and honest to those shipyards, keeping our word to the letter of the contract is fairly essential to that end.
How much time is remaining? The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Wisconsin has 1\1/2\ minutes remaining.
I will wrap this up. I appreciate this debate. I will say this: I am not interested in whether truckers make more money or rails make more money. I am interested in the poor family that has to pay higher prices for food, for clothing, for…





