Mr. Speaker, S. 1198 is Truth in Regulating Act of 2000. It is a bipartisan good government bill. It establishes a regulatory analysis function with the General Accounting Office. This function is intended to enhance congressional responsibility for regulatory decisions developed under the laws Congress enacts. The most basic reason for supporting this bill is constitutional, as Congress needs a Congressional Budget Office to check and balance the executive branch in the budget office, so too does it need an analytic capability to check and balance the executive branch in the regulatory process. GAO is a logical location since it already has some regulatory review responsibilities under the Congressional Review Act. Mr. Speaker, article 1, section 1 of the U.S. Constitution vests all legislative powers in the U.S. Congress. While Congress may not delegate its legislative functions, it routinely authorizes executive branch agencies to issue rules that implement laws passed by Congress. Congress has become increasingly concerned about its responsibility to oversee agency rulemaking, especially due to the extensive costs and impacts of Federal Rules.
Paul Ryan: “Mr. Speaker, S. 1198 is Truth in Regulating Act of 2000. It is a bipartisan good government bill. It establishes a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Truth in Regulating Act of 2000 and its implications for congressional oversight of regulatory decisions.
Share
More from Paul Ryan
What matters is that we're lowering the cost of health care and giving people access to affordable health care plans. Look, the government will always win the war on government-run plans saying, 'If we mandate everybody buys what we say…
The appointment of former FBI Director and respected lawyer Robert Mueller as special counsel for the Russian investigation is a positive development and will provides some certainty for the American people that the investigation will…
If Republicans depend on the quote, 'populist appeal' of one personality or on second rate imitations, then we're not going anywhere.
We are extremely worried about the consequences of the trade war. You know, urging the White House to not advance with this plan.





