Number one, the President already has the power to sign these bills into law. He signs appropriation bills, he signs tax bills, he signs entitlement bills. So this does not give him new power he does not already have. Number two, the gentleman from South Carolina, who is a leader in this area, has been a leader in this area for a long time, sponsored a bill in 1991 that did just this. So I think this is a good idea.
Paul Ryan: “Number one, the President already has the power to sign these bills into law. He signs appropriation bills, he signs tax…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the President's existing powers regarding signing bills into law.
Share
More from Paul Ryan
The appointment of former FBI Director and respected lawyer Robert Mueller as special counsel for the Russian investigation is a positive development and will provides some certainty for the American people that the investigation will…
We must be clear, white supremacy is repulsive. This bigotry is counter to all this country stands for. There can be no moral ambiguity.
The Senate which is a co-equal branch of government has every right not to act on that nomination.
You cannot end that with an executive order. We didn't like it when Obama tried changing immigration laws via executive action. Obviously as conservatives, you know, we believe in the Constitution. You know, as a conservative, I'm a…





