Mr. Panetta said, ``We should set aside a specific amount of the projected budget surplus for either use on entitlement programs or tax cuts, and Members can then fight on how that should be done. But to establish a pay-go account for that purpose and if that pay-go account is exceeded, you then have to pay for any additional spending above that limit.'' Mr. Chairman, this is precisely what my amendment does. It is an amendment that has been endorsed effectively by Mr. Panetta, the former chairman of the House Committee on the Budget, the former chairman of the Office of Management and Budget. To respond to the gentleman from Texas, who is a thoughtful gentleman on these issues, I say that we are always passing tax relief packages here in the House. The only difference that this amendment presents is that if constituents, taxpayers continue to overpay their tax, that should be factored into it. We should not spend the money on discretionary spending if it shows up in town, if we have brand new surpluses.
Paul Ryan: “Mr. Panetta said, ``We should set aside a specific amount of the projected budget surplus for either use on entitlement…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget surplus allocation and tax relief during a House committee meeting.
Share
More from Paul Ryan
Something this big, something this generational, something this profound could not have been done without exquisite presidential leadership. Mr. President, thank you for getting us over to the finish line.
I'm excited about this analysis. And, yes, I think they sort of overestimate the uninsured number, just like they overestimated who would be insured by Obamacare. But I do believe that if we're not going to force people to buy something…
This is a serious moment for our country, and I hope that people in the United States Senate and the house will recognize.
The president's new at this. He's new to government. And so, he probably wasn't steeped in the long running protocols that establish the relationships between DOJ, FBI and White House.





