Mr. Speaker, to respond to a couple of comments from the last speaker, I would say, number one, we are going to keep hearing this rhetoric, that this undermines or destroys employer-sponsored health care. Actually, it is far from that. It is the opposite of that. This makes it easier for employers to offer health care to their employees. What this does is it makes it easier because employers can offer less-costly catastrophic coverage and give their employees money, pretax money in their accounts, to purchase health care. This will lower the cost of health insurance and make it cheaper for employers to offer health care.
Paul Ryan: “Mr. Speaker, to respond to a couple of comments from the last speaker, I would say, number one, we are going to keep…”
On the recordJune 26, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about employer-sponsored health care during a debate on health care policy.
Share
More from Paul Ryan
Mar 12, 2017
I'm excited about this analysis. And, yes, I think they sort of overestimate the uninsured number, just like they overestimated who would be insured by Obamacare. But I do believe that if we're not going to force people to buy something…
Jun 14, 2017
What we're trying to do is tone down the rhetoric, lead by example and show people we can disagree with one another. We can have different ideas without being vitriolic, without going to such extremes.
Feb 5, 2018
This is about FISA abuse, and this is about holding our government accountable, and this is about Congress doing its job in conducting oversight over the executive branch.





