What this does is this elevates the budget resolution to a level of a law. Specifically, this would change the current nonbinding concurrent budget resolution into a joint resolution, which would give the force of law when signed by the President. This would encourage the President to get involved early in the process, instead of having this typical annual brinksmanship that we have in the budget process at the end of the year, so that we can settle on the numbers between the other body, this body, and the White House and move on to good legislation. A joint resolution would be binding and have the force of law so that both the Congress and the White House would work these issues out in the beginning of the annual year. The simplicity of this budget resolution makes agreements easier to reach because negotiations will be forced early on in the process.
Paul Ryan: “What this does is this elevates the budget resolution to a level of a law. Specifically, this would change the current…”
On the recordJune 24, 2004
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Explaining an amendment to elevate the budget resolution to a binding joint resolution during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Paul Ryan
Apr 26, 2017
I'm confident we'll be able to pass a short-term extension and I'd be kind of shocked if the Democrats would want to create a government shutdown because they have been dragging their feet.
Mar 4, 2018
We are extremely worried about the consequences of the trade war. You know, urging the White House to not advance with this plan.
Apr 3, 2017
The committee has to work on a bipartisan basis, something they haven't exactly been doing. He wants them to get to the bottom of things and investigate, in his words, all things Russia.





