We seem to be punting our--a larger Navy into the future on a 2045 time line when really we need to be planning around a 2025 time line.
Mike Gallagher: “We seem to be punting our--a larger Navy into the future on a 2045 time line when really we need to be planning around a…”
Editor's note · Context
Gallagher emphasizes the urgency of planning for Navy resources sooner than 2045.
Share
More from Mike Gallagher
What an incredible opportunity to be able to discuss the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party in general but to American agriculture in particular.
It's clear President Biden does not have a plan to protect the American people--not against crime in our major cities, not at the southern border, and not against the threat of China.
That requires, however, a common purpose and common understanding of the opportunities and the challenges.
In my opinion, the only thing better than producing mass quantities of long-range precision fires ideally with advanced energetics inside of them is doing so in concert with our closest allies, particularly the Aussies and the Brits under…





