In 1996, this blue area on the chart is what the people in Washington reported to the American people as the actual deficit. What that is, is the amount they overdrew their checkbook. They overdrew their checkbook by about $107 billion in this particular year. What they did not tell them is that in addition to that, the Social Security trust fund money was also spent. That is another $65 billion, and the true deficit, had they put the Social Security money aside the way we are supposed to be doing, the true deficit was $172 billion. Again, I would emphasize that in Washington, all the budgets except the one the gentleman and I are working on out here, President Clinton's budget, in 2002 when they say the budget is balanced, what they actually mean is they are going to go into the Social Security trust fund, take out $104 billion, the projected surplus that year. So when they say the budget is balanced, they are going to go into the Social Security trust fund, take out $104 billion, put it in their checkbook and say we balanced the budget. That is ridiculous. In the private sector where both of us come from, you could not get away with that kind of reasoning, and they should not get away with it out here in Washington, DC, either.
Mark Neumann: “In 1996, this blue area on the chart is what the people in Washington reported to the American people as the actual…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the true nature of the federal deficit and the use of Social Security funds.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
I would like to translate this into what it means for an average American out there. When I look at this chart and I see the spending growth rate going down, this distance from here to here not only means a balanced budget. It means…
reclaiming my time, I just had town hall meetings all over the State of Wisconsin, and one question I asked in Wisconsin was how many in this room think government spending should increase faster than the rate of inflation? We didn't get…
Right. Again, I think we have to go back to this understanding that, when people out here talk about cutting spending, they do not actually mean they are cutting spending. They mean, instead of letting the growth rate be double the rate of…
This is really about whether or not the United States government is going to interfere and mandate higher prices than the market would bear for peanuts. The price those farmers are farming and selling those peanuts, who are not under the…





