it seems to have taken 5 nuclear blasts in India, combined with stunning revelations about campaign contributions from Communist China into the Democrat Party to send America a wake-up call. With each passing day, the China scandal gets bigger, more worrisome and more baffling. It is time the White House explains why it granted a waiver to the Loral Corporation and others who are helping China develop its missile and rocket programs. Instead of trying to block high technology transfers to Communist China, this administration seems to be encouraging it. Instead of embarking on a national missile defense program for our country, for America, this administration is allowing the transfer of technology to help China develop missiles that may be aimed at the United States of America. Instead of making nuclear war less likely, this administration appears to be cooperating in making China a nuclear power. The result? Well, India runs 5 nuclear bomb tests; Pakistan will likely follow; even Japan may inevitably reassess its own nuclear policy. It is not a question if this technology will make the world a more dangerous place, it already has.
Mark Neumann: “it seems to have taken 5 nuclear blasts in India, combined with stunning revelations about campaign contributions from…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns over U.S. technology transfers to China and implications for global nuclear policy.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
I hear this cry from my Republican colleagues and some from the other side as well that we should somehow take the Social Security surplus and use it to cut taxes. Why can we not do it the same way we did last year? We started talking…
My only fear listening to this, most of what you said I agree with wholeheartedly, as you well know, is that this becomes very partisan, and Social Security is too important to become partisan. Many of us Republicans also feel that it is…
Right. Again, I think we have to go back to this understanding that, when people out here talk about cutting spending, they do not actually mean they are cutting spending. They mean, instead of letting the growth rate be double the rate of…
the laws changed in 1983. In 1983 they increased the amount of money that was withheld from workers' paychecks because they knew the baby-boom generation was going to get to retirement. And the idea was, by increasing the amount withheld…





