I think the leadership of our Nation needs to set the example and needs to be an example that people both around the world as well as our own teenagers and our own kids can look to. This shows the level of the stock market. This is between here, and the far side of the chart is between the tax increase and when we were first elected to office. This becomes pretty significant, again not because the, not just the Dow Jones has soared as much as it has. It becomes significant because in our society today when I am at town hall meetings and I ask how many people own a stock or a bond or a mutual fund, I mean virtually every hand in the room goes up. So we are now talking about not just numbers and the Dow Jones, we are talking about Main Street America, we are talking about families in Jaynesville and Beloit and Racine. We are talking about regular American families that own stocks and bonds. And what happens is since we were elected, we got spending under control, the interest rates came down; no big surprise. People started buying more houses and cars.
Mark Neumann: “I think the leadership of our Nation needs to set the example and needs to be an example that people both around the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of leadership and the impact of tax increases on American families.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
The difference between a personal audit, though, and a company audit or between a personal audit and this government audit is, in a personal audit when you going to buy a house they verify virtually everything. And I just like to make the…
the laws changed in 1983. In 1983 they increased the amount of money that was withheld from workers' paychecks because they knew the baby-boom generation was going to get to retirement. And the idea was, by increasing the amount withheld…
This is really about whether or not the United States government is going to interfere and mandate higher prices than the market would bear for peanuts. The price those farmers are farming and selling those peanuts, who are not under the…
Would it be fair to say when we look at the Labor Department, they are missing $3 billion, and if we could cut out that part where they cannot find any, we could apply that $3 billion to tax reductions to the American people?





