I feel compelled, even with this respect, to rise and speak against the budget, because tonight we have an historical occasion staring us in the face. In 1990, I sold my business to run for Congress because I had watched what past Congresses had done on balancing the budget. They had pleased the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act, and in the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act they were going to balance the budget by 1991. They went 1 year, then they went off their track and it started going back up again. Then they revised the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act and they went 1 year and it started going back up again. I want to make sure everyone in this room and all my colleagues can see this because we are at this historical point once again this evening.
Mark Neumann: “I feel compelled, even with this respect, to rise and speak against the budget, because tonight we have an historical…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a budget deal during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
reclaiming my time, I just had town hall meetings all over the State of Wisconsin, and one question I asked in Wisconsin was how many in this room think government spending should increase faster than the rate of inflation? We didn't get…
Just for a second, when you have got 760 different education programs run by the United States Government.
I would like to translate this into what it means for an average American out there. When I look at this chart and I see the spending growth rate going down, this distance from here to here not only means a balanced budget. It means…
We are now in surplus in both the general fund and in the Social Security fund. There is such good news on the economic front here.





