That is called takings, and that is the third antienvironmental vote we took. Let me do one more question. If there was a forest fire and the trees burned out, and we are now looking at all this charred timber out there, and a lumber company says I can still harvest some of the timber, even though it is charred, we can still harvest some of this timber. So the lumber company makes a deal they will buy the charred timber and replant the forest. Would it make sense to the gentleman that we would allow the lumber company to go in and harvest the charred timber and replant the forest, as opposed to leaving the charred timber to stay there to rot?
Mark Neumann: “That is called takings, and that is the third antienvironmental vote we took. Let me do one more question. If there was…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental policy and timber harvesting after forest fires.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
That amendment that I brought to the floor to end the cow gas study was very quickly accepted down here. Some of our colleagues may not even be aware that we were spending lots of money, the taxpayers' money to study cow gas out here…
Let me put this in very real terms. That family of 5 I am talking about, they are a $50,000 a year kind of family. When Christmas comes they want to buy presents for their kids, but they are living paycheck to paycheck as they go along…
Foreign operations. We just found it today. There are a series of other things in the same bill that are just fascinating. That is the only thing I can say is it is fascinating. It is equally fascinating as the cow gas study. When you…
I have been here for 4 years. We have come a long ways over those 4 years. We have gotten to a balanced budget for the first time in 30 years. We have restored Medicare, not by raising taxes, as was done in the past. We provided the first…





