Political Quotes

Mark Neumann: this is an amendment to freeze defense spending at last year's levels. It is no big secret in this Nation that elections…

On the recordJune 13, 1996
this is an amendment to freeze defense spending at last year's levels. It is no big secret in this Nation that elections are coming up in November of this year and I have become accustomed to hearing an awful lot of demagoguing. I hope this amendment passes so that there will be no demagoguing come the fall elections this year about defense spending increasing. Mr. Chairman, if we pass this amendment, defense spending is frozen. Period. It is not an increase or decrease. It is frozen, period. And there should be no demagoguing going into the fall elections after we pass this amendment. This amendment freezes defense spending at last year's level. Last year's level was $243 billion. Next year's level would be $243 billion if this is passed. What about defense spending and where does this rate in priorities of the Nation? I think defense spending is one of the highest priorities of the Nation and should be treated that way. But does that mean defense spending should not be treated with the same scrutiny that all other parts of the budget are? Mr. Chairman, I personally think we need to develop a missile defense system for this Nation.
Said by
Mark Neumann
Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing an amendment to freeze defense spending during a floor debate.

Share

More from Mark Neumann

Sep 16, 1998

If we have 90 percent of the money that is coming in for Social Security over and above what we are paying back out to seniors in benefits and 90 percent of that money is set aside and 10 percent is used for tax cuts because that is the…

govinfo.gov
Sep 10, 1998

Let me jump from there into Social Security. You mention their paychecks. At the end of each week, people do get a paycheck. Part of that money goes into Social Security. I would like to just talk through what is happening in Social…

govinfo.gov
Jun 23, 1998

all I know is in the appropriations process right now we have made the decision to go forward with building more buildings. In the debate we have had here in the 3 years since I have been here about the draconian cuts imposed on America by…

govinfo.gov
Jun 23, 1998

Would it be fair to say when we look at the Labor Department, they are missing $3 billion, and if we could cut out that part where they cannot find any, we could apply that $3 billion to tax reductions to the American people?

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation