That is the first antienvironment vote that we took, because that is what we said. We want a cost-benefit analysis before we enact a new regulation. Does the gentleman think it makes sense, when we talk about spending the American taxpayers' dollars to clean up waste sites, that we first do a risk assessment and we clean up the sites that are the highest risk to the environment first and the other ones later?
Mark Neumann: “That is the first antienvironment vote that we took, because that is what we said. We want a cost-benefit analysis…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing environmental regulations and cleanup priorities during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
If we have 90 percent of the money that is coming in for Social Security over and above what we are paying back out to seniors in benefits and 90 percent of that money is set aside and 10 percent is used for tax cuts because that is the…
as you know, I am a former home builder and very familiar with the role of home mortgages in the country. We have about 23,000 mortgage brokers that originate half of all home mortgages throughout the country. These are small businessmen…
Just reclaiming my time, I cannot help but point out that the great State of Wisconsin is out in front of the country again on this issue, as they were with welfare reform under Governor Tommy Thompson. They are now out in front in terms…
I rise tonight to first address just briefly what my colleagues have been talking to me about, or have been talking about here on the floor in advance of me, and that is health care in America. We hear so much about HMOs that are not doing…





