That is the first antienvironment vote that we took, because that is what we said. We want a cost-benefit analysis before we enact a new regulation. Does the gentleman think it makes sense, when we talk about spending the American taxpayers' dollars to clean up waste sites, that we first do a risk assessment and we clean up the sites that are the highest risk to the environment first and the other ones later?
Discussing environmental regulations and cleanup priorities during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
It passed without a single, solitary Republican vote. I am sure the gentleman from Michigan remembers what I am talking about here. It is the biggest tax increase in American history.
We are now in surplus in both the general fund and in the Social Security fund. There is such good news on the economic front here.
Reclaiming my time again, I would like to ask my friend from Michigan that all important question, have you seen anything in your years here in Washington that would lead you to believe that somehow because we are here in Washington we…
For the first time since 1969 for the last 12 months running, this government spent less money than they had in their checkbook. That is just a monumental change in the way things have been done. I should say it again because it is that…
Other voices in this conversation
