Just to make the record 100 percent clear, if this amendment is passed, there is still $700 million of unexpended FEMA money in here. So the gap that the gentleman is talking about and, by the way, I very much respect the chairman of our subcommittee, but the gap he is talking about is more than covered by the $700 million of unobligated and unallocated funds that are still in here. So make no mistake, this does not wipe out all the money like it should. It only wipes out $1.7 billion of it, leaving $700 million still available to cover what the gentleman is referring to.
Mark Neumann: “Just to make the record 100 percent clear, if this amendment is passed, there is still $700 million of unexpended FEMA…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to FEMA funding.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
yes, those deficits that the American people and my colleagues talked about all through the late 1980s and the early 1990s, they took all of that Social Security surplus, they put it all in the big government checkbook, they wrote out…
Reclaiming my time again, I would like to ask my friend from Michigan that all important question, have you seen anything in your years here in Washington that would lead you to believe that somehow because we are here in Washington we…
I have been here for 4 years. We have come a long ways over those 4 years. We have gotten to a balanced budget for the first time in 30 years. We have restored Medicare, not by raising taxes, as was done in the past. We provided the first…
If we look at this chart over here, and we see that spending was going up at this rate before, and now spending is only going up at this rate and even slower yet, if the government had spent this much more money instead of doing tax cuts…





