I think what the gentleman talks about, and I showed this chart earlier this evening, but when he talks about what happened, and they said the 1993 tax increase somehow solved this problem. This is in 1995, 2 years after the tax increase, where the deficit was going when we got here. This is the President's budget proposal in April of 1995. This is where the deficit was going. It is not the tax increase that solved the problem. It was a combination of a strong economy coupled with controlled Washington spending, getting the growth rate of Washington spending under control. The yellow line is our first 12 months here, the green line is what we hope to do, and the blue line, reaching balanced budget 4 years ahead of schedule, is what has actually happened.
Mark Neumann: “I think what the gentleman talks about, and I showed this chart earlier this evening, but when he talks about what…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the 1993 tax increase on the federal deficit during a floor speech.
Share
More from Mark Neumann
Just for a second, when you have got 760 different education programs run by the United States Government.
help me understand why it is that, as a taxpayer sends their money to Washington, and Washington decides how to best provide education for those kids back home, what exactly is it in the water out here or what is out here that makes us…
This is not about me and it is not me that did this. We did this. A lot of new Members that came in in 1994 feel very strongly about this and we have done this together. But it is not even us that is doing it. It is the American people…
I want to be very clear on why it is that I am voting for impeachment. I would like to bring this whole discussion back to the facts in the case. What do we know here? We know we have a 50-year-old married man, the most powerful man in the…





