Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: Mr. Chairman, it is beyond time to restructure one of the worst-run agencies in the Federal Government, the Immigration…

On the recordApril 25, 2002
Mr. Chairman, it is beyond time to restructure one of the worst-run agencies in the Federal Government, the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The INS has long been considered the undesirable and unwanted stepchild of the Justice Department. It carries out neither of its crucial missions well, enforcing our immigration laws and providing services to immigrants playing by the rules. Today, we must stop being enablers, stop giving more and more money to an agency as a reward for squandering the money we gave it the year before. We must practice tough love and abolish the INS. In its place, we need to create two separate immigration bureaus in the Justice Department, a Bureau of Immigration Enforcement and a Bureau of Citizen and Immigration Services. This is what the Barbara Jordan Immigration Reform and Accountability Act of 2002 is all about. I am proud of the work of the Committee on the Judiciary in crafting this legislation on a cooperative and bipartisan basis. Barbara Jordan, our distinguished former colleague, chaired the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. The Commission came to the conclusion that the INS suffers from institutional schizophrenia, or mission overload. It explained that the INS must give equal weight to more priorities than any one agency can handle. Such a system is set up for failure, and with such failure, a loss of public confidence. That is exactly what has happened.…
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Addressing the need to restructure the Immigration and Naturalization Service during a committee discussion.

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Sep 30, 2020

I remain skeptical of proposals that break up these companies, mandate a one-size-fits-all data standard, or create a government-run 'public option.'

congress.gov
Jul 28, 2020

Wouldn't that be up to somebody on the other side of the issue to say that this is not proven?

congress.gov
Feb 13, 2020

Do I put the question before or after it is passed? The SPEAKER pro tempore. At the time the Chair puts the question on passage.

govinfo.gov
Dec 10, 2019

the chairman and those on his side of the aisle are dead-wrong on all of the issues that we have been debating.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation