this amendment is critical to the debate on what direction this crime bill will take. Will it be a crime bill that gives the tools to our police and prosecutors and other law enforcement authorities to put people away and to have them serve their sentences even if it should be a sentence of death? Or will it be another wolf in sheep's clothing where people posture, saying that they want to be tough on crime but, looking at the details, comes up with the opposite conclusion? Mr. Chairman, this bill, I think, represents legislative schizophrenia in the area of the death penalty and in many other areas, and the amendment that is offered by the gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Hyde] is medicine to cure schizophrenia in the area of habeas corpus. Mr. Chairman, what the amendment of the gentleman from Illinois proposes to do is to reinstate existing law on the subject of appeals in death row cases.
Jim Sensenbrenner: “this amendment is critical to the debate on what direction this crime bill will take. Will it be a crime bill that gives…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of an amendment related to the death penalty in the crime bill.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
I challenge you, because every one of you that will vote no on this amendment is going to be saying, I think that Joe Biden is a liar.
I believe U.S. citizens would be best served if antitrust continues to retain its traditional focus on promoting consumer welfare and competition in markets.
I appeal the decision of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The terms of House Resolution 842 are unambiguous and so, consistent with the ruling of the Chair on September 16, 1977, to permit an appeal in this case would be tantamount to…
Do I put the question before or after it is passed? The SPEAKER pro tempore. At the time the Chair puts the question on passage.





