Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: Mr. Speaker, news stories extolling the successful use of DNA to solve crimes abound. Consider the following: in 1999…

On the recordNovember 5, 2003
Mr. Speaker, news stories extolling the successful use of DNA to solve crimes abound. Consider the following: in 1999, New York authorities linked a man through DNA evidence to at least 22 sexual assaults and robberies that had terrorized the city. In 2002, authorities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Fort Collins, Colorado, used DNA evidence to link and solve a series of crimes perpetrated by the same individual. In the State of Washington during 2001, DNA evidence provided a major breakthrough of the ``Green River'' killings, a series of crimes that had remained unsolved for years despite a large law enforcement task force and a $15 million investigation. DNA is generally used to solve crimes in one of two ways. In cases where a suspect is identified, a lawfully obtained sample of that person's DNA can be compared to evidence from the crime scene. The results of this comparison may help establish whether the suspect committed the crime. In cases where a suspect has not yet been identified, biological evidence from the crime scene can be analyzed and compared to offender profiles in DNA databases to help identify the perpetrator. DNA evidence has also been used successfully to free individuals who have been wrongfully convicted.
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the effectiveness of DNA evidence in solving crimes.

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Sep 29, 2020

I did not, and there is no system that I know of that provides artists with compensation when their work is used.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2019

I challenge you, because every one of you that will vote no on this amendment is going to be saying, I think that Joe Biden is a liar.

congress.gov
Jun 9, 2020

It's up to us to constructively deal with this so that we can do more than just have a press release and make a difference.

congress.gov
Feb 13, 2020

I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation