Since the House acted last session on the clinic access bill, the Supreme Court rendered a unanimous decision that subjects people who protest in front of abortion clinics to treble damages under the law. Since both the Senate version and the House version of this bill create a new Federal cause of action civilly with treble damages, as well as subject these people to Federal criminal penalties, does not the gentleman from Texas feel that the combination of these three types of penalties is a bit of an overkill?
Jim Sensenbrenner: “Since the House acted last session on the clinic access bill, the Supreme Court rendered a unanimous decision that…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is questioning the severity of penalties in a bill related to protests at abortion clinics.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
It's up to us to constructively deal with this so that we can do more than just have a press release and make a difference.
I appeal that ruling of the Chair as well, which I believe is appealable. The SPEAKER pro tempore. That ruling is not subject to appeal. The question is on the passage of the joint resolution. The question was taken; and the Speaker pro…
I've been in Congress 42 years. That's coming to an end at the end of this year. I'm breathing a sigh of relief.
I am no stranger to this debate. In the aftermath of 9/11, I stood on this floor to advance the USA PATRIOT Act. I still believe, as I did at the time, in its necessity to protect our country from terrorist attacks. In 2015, after abuses…





