Mr. Speaker, I think this precedent has already been set, and I would like to read from the National Science Foundation fact sheet that outlines the awards that the President of the United States offers every year. It says, the presidential award for excellence in mathematics and science teaching is the Nation's highest commendation for K-12 math and science teachers. It recognizes the combination of sustained and exemplary work, both in and outside of the classroom. Each award includes a grant of $7,500 from the NSF to the recipient school. Winners use the money at their discretion to promote math and science education. Frequently asked questions: What are the PAEMST selection criteria? Answer: The program is open to practicing public, private and parochial school teachers with a minimum of 5 years experience. Then there is a press release attached to this that says President Clinton has recognized 214 mathematics and science teachers for their innovative and outstanding contributions to their professions under the presidential awards for excellence in mathematics and science teaching programs. Now, if the gentleman from Virginia's argument is valid, then all of the awards that President Clinton has passed out in the last 8 years to private and parochial school teachers, because they have done a good job in the classroom, never should have been paid and are unconstitutional.
Jim Sensenbrenner: “Mr. Speaker, I think this precedent has already been set, and I would like to read from the National Science Foundation…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the presidential award for excellence in mathematics and science teaching during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Successful implementation of the mandate for competition in the antitrust laws encourages innovation, which is the main driver of economic growth.
One of the few things that deans do around here, aside from using our institutional memory, is to ask unanimous consent that people who are elected in special elections from their State be permitted to take the oath of office. Today it is…
I appeal the decision of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The terms of House Resolution 842 are unambiguous and so, consistent with the ruling of the Chair on September 16, 1977, to permit an appeal in this case would be tantamount to…
You know, I think that antitrust law has to continue to be focused on consumer welfare rather than deviating into other problem areas.





