On the recordJuly 16, 2013
But they don't determine which specific phone calls are relevant pursuant to the statute. You do that.
Source
congress.govJim Sensenbrenner: “But they don't determine which specific phone calls are relevant pursuant to the statute. You do that.”
Editor's note · Context
Sensenbrenner emphasizes the role of the security apparatus in determining relevance of phone calls.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
May 19, 2020
One of the few things that deans do around here, aside from using our institutional memory, is to ask unanimous consent that people who are elected in special elections from their State be permitted to take the oath of office. Today it is…
Feb 13, 2020
It is my intention to raise a point of order that this resolution requires a two-thirds vote. I will argue the point of order when it is made, but I need to know when the proper time is to raise the point of order. The SPEAKER pro tempore…
Jul 28, 2020
I have reached the conclusion that we do not need to change our antitrust laws. They have been working just fine.
Feb 13, 2020
I appeal the decision of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The terms of House Resolution 842 are unambiguous and so, consistent with the ruling of the Chair on September 16, 1977, to permit an appeal in this case would be tantamount to…
Other voices in this conversation
