Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: Mr. Speaker, section 414 does allow an investment banker that previously represented a business to continue to represent…

On the recordJanuary 28, 2004
Mr. Speaker, section 414 does allow an investment banker that previously represented a business to continue to represent the business after it files for bankruptcy. Under current law, that investment banker would be prohibited from representing the debtor on a per se basis. Let me say that this issue was debated in the Committee on the Judiciary. There was an amendment that was offered, and it was rejected by a vote of 12 to 17 when H.R. 975 was marked up in the committee. This issue was not brought up during the conference committee on H.R. 333 in the previous Congress. And to my knowledge, there was no motion to instruct on this issue that was ever made by anyone. Let me say I am as sensitive to conflicts of interest as anybody else. But if you have this absolute bar, an investment banker that knows something about the business would be disqualified and then the business if it was trying to reorganize under chapter 11 would have to hire a new investment banker, and the new investment banker would end up having to be paid for all the time to get himself or that institution's self up to speed on the issues of the business. So section 414 was designed to provide the professional advice that investment bankers give in a way that would be able to reduce the cost to the estate of the bankrupt business.
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the implications of section 414 regarding investment bankers in bankruptcy cases.

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Feb 13, 2020

I appeal the decision of the Chair. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The terms of House Resolution 842 are unambiguous and so, consistent with the ruling of the Chair on September 16, 1977, to permit an appeal in this case would be tantamount to…

govinfo.gov
Feb 13, 2020

Parliamentary inquiry. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Wisconsin will state his parliamentary inquiry.

govinfo.gov
Jul 28, 2020

I have reached the conclusion that we do not need to change our antitrust laws. They have been working just fine.

congress.gov
Dec 10, 2019

the chairman and those on his side of the aisle are dead-wrong on all of the issues that we have been debating.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation