Mr. Speaker, did the gentleman from New Jersey just say that the level of penalty depends upon the content of the sign? Meaning if you are waving a sign that says ``On strike for higher wages,'' and stand in front of the door, that is just a misdemeanor? But if the sign on the other hand says, ``Don't kill your baby,'' that is a felony?
Questioning the implications of penalties based on the content of protest signs during a debate.
Share
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Successful implementation of the mandate for competition in the antitrust laws encourages innovation, which is the main driver of economic growth.
Wouldn't that be up to somebody on the other side of the issue to say that this is not proven?
You know, I think that antitrust law has to continue to be focused on consumer welfare rather than deviating into other problem areas.
I'm not going to be on this committee in the next Congress. I am going to put my feet up and become a 'senior, statesman.'
Other voices in this conversation
