Currently we do have a body of law with a substantial deference standard that is in the current law that this legislation repeals and does not substitute another standard and basically makes this a matter of judicial discretion.
On the recordJune 3, 2009
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
He expresses concern about losing legal certainty with proposed changes to information suppression standards.
Share & report
More from Jim Sensenbrenner
Dec 3, 2019
I'm a veteran of impeachments. I've been named by the House as an impeachment manager in four impeachments.
Sep 4, 2019
The onus is now on Congress to create a new coverage formula to reinvigorate the Act's most important enforcement mechanism--its preclearance requirement.
Dec 8, 2019
That is the beginning of a surveillance state which I think is outrageous, particularly since with the Freedom Act in 2013, we curtailed the NSC's ability about that.
Nov 12, 2019
I have expressed repeatedly that Europe's General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, has been designed to squeeze out competitors and help entrench large incumbents.





