Political Quotes

Jim Sensenbrenner: Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4679, the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act of 2002, amends the current law, which grants…

On the recordJune 25, 2002
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 4679, the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act of 2002, amends the current law, which grants Federal courts the authority to include in any sentence a term of supervised release after imprisonment. Under this legislation, a court would be authorized to impose a term of supervised release for any term of years or life for a number of serious sex offenses. These offenses include crimes of sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children, transportation for illegal sexual activity, sex trafficking of children by force, fraud, or coercion. Under current law, a term of supervised release for any of these crimes is limited to a maximum term of between 1 and 5 years. This legislation will provide judges with greater discretion in dealing with sex offenders. The court imposing the sentence is in the best possible position to determine if an extended period of supervision is necessary, based on that court's knowledge of the facts of the case and the defendant's criminal history. The court is also in the best position to determine what conditions of release are necessary to ensure the defendant will not reoffend and the public will be safe. There is no requirement in this bill that a judge impose any term of supervised release if the court feels that it is not necessary. The court may also revoke such supervision at any time after 1 year if the court decides that supervision is no longer warranted.
Said by
Jim Sensenbrenner
Republican · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the Lifetime Consequences for Sex Offenders Act of 2002.

Share

More from Jim Sensenbrenner

Dec 10, 2019

This is the third time in the last 40 years, 45 years that this committee has sat to the Articles of Impeachment against the President of the United States.

congress.gov
Feb 13, 2020

I make the point of order that a two-thirds vote is required for passage of this joint resolution because it does have the effect of amending the Constitution. And on the point of order, Madam Speaker, there was an extension that was…

govinfo.gov
Feb 13, 2020

Do I put the question before or after it is passed? The SPEAKER pro tempore. At the time the Chair puts the question on passage.

govinfo.gov
Dec 10, 2019

I think it is very obvious that there was no treason or bribery alleged here.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation